Is there any difference between a cheaper blu-ray player and a ps3 in visual quality?
My dad bought a ps3 a while back and he said i can take it as long as I replace it with another blu-ray player. Is there any difference in visual quality between a ps3 and a cheap blu-ray player? (one that goes for about 150$) PLEASE HELP
Possibly Related Posts:
- Blu-Ray Player Laptop External USB DVD RW Burner Drive
- Samsung BD-C7500 1080p Blu-ray Disc Player
- Philips BDP7520/F7 Wi-Fi Ready Blu Ray Player with Full HD 3D and BD Live, Black
- Toshiba WLM-10UB1 Wireless Adapter for BDX2500 Blu-Ray Disc Player, Black
- New 2010 SAMSUNG 3D BD-C6800 WI-FI Blu Ray Player Multi Zone Region Code Free DVD 123456 PAL/NTSC Blu Ray Zone A+B+C Player, DivX AVI MKV, NETFLIX, YOUTUBE ….100~240V 50/60Hz World-Wide Voltage. PAL or MULTI-SYSTEM TV is required to watch PAL DVDs
One Response to “Is there any difference between a cheaper blu-ray player and a ps3 in visual quality?”
The PS3 is still rated very highly in blu-ray player reviews, usually because of all it’s other features and the ability to update features and firmware. If your dad just wants a player then i’m sure a $150 will be fine, there may be a reduction in quality but it wont be huge.
Suggest a model to your dad and see what he thinks.
The person below who says that the PS3 doesn’t have 7.1 or TrueHD is wrong. I know because I use both. You just need an AV receiver that supports it, and that applies to ALL blu-ray players.