Feed Me
- Sade: Bring Me Home – Live 2011 (Blu-ray) May 14, 2012
- Panasonic DMP-BD77 Ultra-Fast Booting Blu-ray Disc Player May 13, 2012
- Iron Man 2 (Three-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo + Digital Copy) May 8, 2012
- Act of Valor [Blu-ray] May 5, 2012
- Beauty and the Beast (Three-Disc Diamond Edition Blu-ray/DVD Combo in Blu-ray Packaging) May 3, 2012
- Titanic (Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / Digital Copy + UltraViolet Digital Copy) April 30, 2012
- Titanic 3-D (History Channel) [Blu-ray] April 28, 2012
- Stargate (15th Anniversary Edition) [Blu-ray] April 27, 2012
- Jaws [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy + UltraViolet] (Universal’s 100th Anniversary) April 26, 2012
- All About Blu Ray Player and Blu Ray Technology December 12, 2009
Is there a noticable difference in using a 1.1 HDMI cable versus a 1.3 HDMI cable on a Blu-Ray dvd player?
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Is there a noticable difference in using a 1.1 HDMI cable versus a 1.3 HDMI cable on a Blu-Ray dvd player?”.
Filed under Blu-ray | . Taged: Basic 1, Blu Ray Dvd, Blu Ray Dvd Player, Cable Tv, Monster Cable, Noticable Difference
One Response to “Is there a noticable difference in using a 1.1 HDMI cable versus a 1.3 HDMI cable on a Blu-Ray dvd player?”
No it won't make a difference for your setup (unless your tv supports "deep color" and then it is only a slight difference).
If your bluray player is a PS3 under display settings set "RGB full Range" to FUll and "Y Pb/Cb Pr/Cr Super White to On"
The different versions of HDMI cable upogrraded the frequencies that could be sent to through the cable. 1080P @60hz is easily supported on the first version and most sound (bitstream at really high qualities like those in 22.2 theater sound are not supported by HDMI cables).
The Monstercable you bought was a waste of money though because the digital signal in HDMI is either 100% or nothing. Interference through the cable doesn't cause alterations on the screen or sound.