Is there a noticable difference in using a 1.1 HDMI cable versus a 1.3 HDMI cable on a Blu-Ray dvd player?
Do I need to replace the cable or does it really matter? Just wondering how much if any it really affects the picture quality when using a blu-ray dvd player. I have monster cable for TV but only basic 1.1 cable for the dvd player.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Blu-Ray Player Laptop External USB DVD RW Burner Drive
- Samsung BD-C7500 1080p Blu-ray Disc Player
- Philips BDP7520/F7 Wi-Fi Ready Blu Ray Player with Full HD 3D and BD Live, Black
- Toshiba WLM-10UB1 Wireless Adapter for BDX2500 Blu-Ray Disc Player, Black
- New 2010 SAMSUNG 3D BD-C6800 WI-FI Blu Ray Player Multi Zone Region Code Free DVD 123456 PAL/NTSC Blu Ray Zone A+B+C Player, DivX AVI MKV, NETFLIX, YOUTUBE ….100~240V 50/60Hz World-Wide Voltage. PAL or MULTI-SYSTEM TV is required to watch PAL DVDs
Filed under Blu-ray | . Taged: Basic 1, Blu Ray Dvd, Blu Ray Dvd Player, Cable Tv, Monster Cable, Noticable Difference
One Response to “Is there a noticable difference in using a 1.1 HDMI cable versus a 1.3 HDMI cable on a Blu-Ray dvd player?”
No it won't make a difference for your setup (unless your tv supports "deep color" and then it is only a slight difference).
If your bluray player is a PS3 under display settings set "RGB full Range" to FUll and "Y Pb/Cb Pr/Cr Super White to On"
The different versions of HDMI cable upogrraded the frequencies that could be sent to through the cable. 1080P @60hz is easily supported on the first version and most sound (bitstream at really high qualities like those in 22.2 theater sound are not supported by HDMI cables).
The Monstercable you bought was a waste of money though because the digital signal in HDMI is either 100% or nothing. Interference through the cable doesn't cause alterations on the screen or sound.